YET ANOTHER COVER THEORY ON WTC COLLAPSES

A decade later yet another theory is floated as to how the Twin Towers somehow collapsed on 9/11/01 - this time the diversion, er, theory is that chemicals mixed with the heat to cause a catastrophic explosion (did you see a big explosion just prior to the collapses?) - article here ... the fires burned less than 2 hours in one tower and less than 1 hour in the other with no major explosion witnessed - the towers collapsed inward upon themselves on their own footprint. What doesn't get mentioned hardly at all is that in 1975 a fire raged for over 3 hours in one of the towers and spread up communications shafts to other floors. And there were no sprinklers in place. No structural steel was damaged, no weakness in the trusses was detected. The explosion in a nearby garage that shook the towers in the 1993 attack also did not show damage to the previously burned areas.  The WTC were full of asbestos between 400 and 2000 tons; it would have taken double-digit billions more to tear them down than it did to build them; by May 2001 the courts had ruled against the NY/NY Port Authority (WTC owners) who had sued to get insurance money to remove the asbestos; just weeks before the attacks the WTC - which couldn't be torn down (due to the asbestos threat), couldn't be remodeled (asbestos and regulations) were leased for 99 years by Larry Silverstein who had built WTC 7 and who took out insurance policies worth billions which included in its provisions terrorist attacks. To date Silverstein has cleared over $5 billion in his insurance policies (more than he paid by almost double) and he is on video saying the "decision was made to pull it" of building 7. When the truth emerges about who put together the 9/11 attacks, and which ancillary players participated and pushed it through that are American or Israeli citizens (or both), and who profited - it will be an ugly ugly tapestry indeed - and it will be a far darker day for America to realize that we were so utterly played that day.